>>
|
9a281a.jpg
Untamed Twilight Stone
9a281a
>Are you saying the magic pencil, floating rocks, lack of a need for eat/drink, full body transformations, and immortality can all be explained by science? Almost all of those things violate conservation of energy.
I'm saying, if magic exists, then for all intents and purpose it's just another field of science to those who use and understand and experiment with it.
Conservation of energy is only a law due to evidence. If you find evidence that appears to contradict it, you either do not fully understand the situation (for instance, is there a source of energy for these processes we are unaware of?), or you have to accept your law is wrong, and revise your understanding of the universe.
Mostly, I take offense to the attitude that 'blank disproves science'. Science is a method for understanding. You cannot disprove that. You can discredit specific theories, but discovering these mistakes only leads to better understanding.
So long as systems have rules to be uncovered, you're doing science. And as we've seen so far, there are rules here. We ask questions, we experiment, we learn.
This is besides the point, though. Getting back to that.
>Heaven, Hell, and Limbo are all religious concepts, so for them to actually exist, some form of religion would have to be real
No. All that means is that religion got something right, or that the places were named by dead people with a religious mind-view, or that religious used the names of real things in their belief systems. None of which proves anything.
>Which, again, means there is a god in this world.
No, it doesn't. At all. We know these things exist. We don't know that anyone created them, or even runs them. It's possible there's a god in this setting, sure! But there's no proof. The concept of an afterlife can exist without a god.
|