Depends.

Write something up here. I'll take a look at it.

I'm not terribly familiar with the lore, but perhaps we can help find a middle ground.

"MtG fluff" is horrendously nonspecific. There's many universes, and many time periods.

I might be interested, depending on how it played out.

FFFFF

somehow I forgot to mention that it was based on Zendikar, and that I had tried to run in on 4chan but it tended toward people not postan in it by the end.

>>317305
On the other hand, I like that it can apply to nearly everything.
All it needs is rough analogues for color, and away it goes.
Granted, this means a massive gap between fluff and crunch, but that frees up the fluff to go in nearly any direction.

>>317314
Sounds like a good idea, at worst you just have a repeat of the old, with no interest. Generally though, you'll get a much higher caliber of suggestion here.

>>317318

Alright then.

Probably will start on next weekend.