So it's going to be about roleplaying an emo kid, serious?
I mean it's /quest/, but fuck if that's not a record low.

>>146124
And that is what the minimize button is for.

>>146124

It's had some pretty good results in the past.
>>>/questarch/513749

>>146126
the good result included what my first post was about: >>146114

Trolls trolling trolls.

>>146112
You should walk into the road and kill yourself.

It'll fix all your problems

/quest/ is just going down hill fast and threads like this just prove it

I think some people are missing the point here.

The quest centers around this very lame individual. We can fuck up his life if we want, or try to make him a better person. We're not supposed to roleplay as him or sympathize with him. It's supposed to be kindof meta.

>>322238
So, we are...
So, this guy came to quest for advice. And we're the anons.
Whoa.

This quest reminds of this one

>>/graveyard/69513

It's in the same vein.

I find this hilarious and pledge my full life-ruining support. AntiRomanticar, here we come!

Who is with me on making him run away to California where he will become a pornstar staring in bad gay porn and dominatrix rape fantasies?

>>322244
No, no, come one he mentioned a sister who loves being tickled.

You must think inside the box.

>>322245
No she loves tickling him. She could become one of the dominatrixes that rapes him on film.

>>322246

It never specified, he just said she thinks tickling is fun.
If there must be dominatrix is needs to be at home where the paretns can walk in causing all sorts of awkward situations. Don't you agree?

>>322247
But it would be so much more awkward if his dad or mom found out while surfing for porn. But it could start at home I guess.

everryone got it worng. he is depressed and a emo, so to end his emoness we must help him to find his inner self and to express that.

with badassery acts.

lets turn him into Bart MK II

>>322257
bleh why not have him continue to humiliate himself.

Hey, now, who hasn't wanted to abuse an emo kid? This could be fun.

>>322235
Oh god i lol'd

This quest is complete garbage. It's pretty much the first Romanticar without anything redeeming. And MORE incest? Goddammit, this is the worst thing on the board.

>>322290
>Goddammit, this is the worst thing on the board.
Not even close.

>>322298

Yeah, you're right. This is the worst IMAGE quest on the boards. Hey Reaver, why not stop doing these terrible Romanticar rehashes and do a quest with a plot? Knights Blades and Mudy both need endings. Why not stop wasting our time with these pointless romance/incest quests?

>>322303
But not following a formula is hard.
And hell even if we all went DO X the nature of this "Quest" is that he can just go NO and it not technically being railroading.

Hey Reaver maybe you should just get AIDS and write a book about it and tour the country and get it turned into a movie that gets several Oscar nods and then on your deathbed say something really really profound and become a pop culture icon and get a musical biopic based on you REAVER
Am I right

woah and now i'm losing track of which thread is the quest and which is the discussion.

This quest is the cancer.

>>322312

This. Both this quest and Valley of Love showcase everything that's wrong with /quest/ recently. Valley of Love is pretty much just a furry's wet dream turned into a quest, (with a plot hastily added in near the end) while this new quest is unoriginal shit done in a previous quest. I think someone before me said it best: it's just a Romanticar redo. The main character could practically be named 58. To top it off, the thing is written in a style that makes me wanna kill myself. Quest minimized.

I mean, why not just finish a quest? Or maybe do one that's not the same old sex shit. Or a quest that doesn't devolve into sex shit, like Knights Blades did.

I totally agree, TGchan should be a "no fun" zone, and there should be more rules limiting quest content. Bad authors should be banned, and the 'minimize thread' options should get removed.
I think every thread should have a vote-delete so it can be removed if it's not in TGchan's best interest.

>>322324

I'm sorry, I didn't realize it was a crime to have standards, or post your opinions. Also, I like Reaver's old quests. I just think these new ones are dumb, plotless and thoughtless.

This reminds me a lot of stock /tg/ in how the board was always better a year before, and people are perpetually claiming things are spiraling down the deep end because they don't approve of what seems to be popular at the time.

>>322326

Dude not even a year ago Reaver was giving us Mudy, and I think Mudy was 100x better than this crap, and if you disagree then I don't know what you've been smoking. It had a plot, for one. But you're right. Maybe I should just mindlessly approve of what's popular at the time. Peer pressure is kewl!

I don't get what the big deal is. If you don't want to read it, minimize it and the discussion thread too. Just because you don't enjoy it doesn't mean others won't or can't.

This is in no way a defense of Reaver and his shitty quests, but it's getting a little ridiculous. Just hide his crappy threads and move on.

>>322332

If there's a discussion thread, I don't see why people can't post their opinions of the quest. They're not posting it in the actual quest, so what's the big deal?

>>322332
while i do not agree with your opinion of reaver's quests, i agree with your methods. have a good day sir.

Hey guys, let's keep it civil.

You're free to share negative opinions in here; let's not start throwing insults around. Anybody who needs further explanation can tell me in IRC

Either cheer up or I'm going to use admin powers to cover this thread in kittens. Cover it.

>>322341
Kittens you say? :3

...how many IDs in this thread are completely new?

>>322341
>Either cheer up or I'm going to use admin powers to cover this thread in kittens. Cover it.
Actually that sounds pretty cool to me

>>322330
>Weaver...
I know it's hard to tell when you have a dozen different IDs but most people just stick to one.
It probably helps that I'm not a mod here though.

>>322327
>Maybe I should just mindlessly approve of what's popular at the time.
No, you're free to hate what you like. There are plenty of quests I find asinine or stupid or whatever. But I just choose not to read them, instead of going into the threads about those quests and shitting all over everything.

>>322358
>There are plenty of quests I find asinine or stupid or whatever. But I just choose not to read them, instead of going into the threads about those quests and shitting all over everything.
I agree with this so hard.

I, for one, would not mind if this quest perished in short order.

>>322358
>But I just choose not to read them
I guess the same reasoning could be applied to discussions threads.
>>322341
Is that supposed to be an official staff announcement?

>>322366

I doubt it. I do believe that, like captain slowpoke notded - discussions should be kept civil. And that's the only rule about the discussions here.

The staff shouldn't be sorting out which opinion is wrong and which is right, or telling people to shut up. That kills the discussion and doesn't make us look any better.

People should be able to express their like or dislike towards what the author is doing and they shouldn't be punished for it.

>>322367
>People should be able to express their like or dislike towards what the author is doing and they shouldn't be punished for it.
I think you're painting with strokes too broad. This is not a black and white "everything or nothing" situation.
Commenting on a quest you care about by saying "this is going in a bad direction, here's how we can save it" or something like that is one thing. Constructive criticism, sure. But if all you have to say is "this is garbage" and "I hope this quest dies", what does that add? To the discussion? To the board?
It's like you just said: discussion should be civil. What's possibly civil about insults and statements like "shitty quest"?

I think people should be able to make criticisms, sure, but if every poster went to the thread of every quest they didn't like and just posted "This is absolute shit and I hope it dies" do you really think that makes this a better place?

>322358
>It probably helps that I'm not a mod here though.
I guess that's right, considering you and Reaver were mods until you used your powers to oppress any opinions you didn't like and got demodded again

Hater Hatin Totallynotsamefag!!V1AJL5LzHl 2010/03/14(Sun)06:16 No. 12572 ID: 37ab54
File 126857259586.jpg - (49.50KB , 540x702 , haters gunna hate cat.jpg )

Well I'm bored and a little sleepy so I think I'll go ahead and post all my complaints. Which honestly aren't many. Just that he is not even a poser Emo.

First off: HUGE NECK in the first 2 kinda implies he has good posture. Poser emos slouch. Real Emos slouch till their head is between their knees

Second: Posters look more like goth stuff... wait that is a poser emo thing my bad that's fine.

Third: iphone and anything else static needs approximately 80 bajillion stickers of all his favorite products, bands, and more things implying he cuts himself and hates life.

Fourth: NO EMO, POSER OR NOT EVER SMILES. EVER.

Fifth: Talks way too much like a retarded valley girl. The gayest acting gay guy I have ever met didn't end that many sentences in question marks. cut back on em so they aren't 2:1 to periods and you should be fine.

Sixth, more of an art thing: iPhone blur shouldn't compose the whole picture. at least a little bit should be in focus. Could've gotten away with it if her thumb was in the way.

Anyways I kinda like this one even if I know it won't have an ending. Besides the short return to POINTY FACE in the OP it's a real nice increase in quality. I also love the semi-trolling ironic humor. Keep it up Reaver.

Anonymous 2010/03/14(Sun)06:43 No. 12573 ID: 889351
File 126857419334.jpg - (66.19KB , 900x660 , kitten800.jpg )

Only one personal insult so far, deleted, so no need for emergency kittens. Thanks for keeping it about the quest, and thanks to those that are avoiding hyperbole.

Totallynotsamefag!!V1AJL5LzHl 2010/03/14(Sun)06:51 No. 12574 ID: 37ab54
File 12685746786.jpg - (29.17KB , 482x327 , kittens.jpg )

this thread is now about adorable kittens

Anonymous 2010/03/14(Sun)07:00 No. 12575 ID: 758ff3
File 126857524856.jpg - (554.80KB , 800x1046 , lol.jpg )

Still having sleepless nights about me, Weaver?

Weaver 2010/03/14(Sun)07:13 No. 12576 ID: f609ed
File 126857599682.jpg - (18.83KB , 478x358 , story.jpg )

>>322370
>I guess that's right, considering you and Reaver were mods until you used your powers to oppress any opinions you didn't like and got demodded again
I was never at any point a mod on any board on tgchan. You were misinformed.

>>322375
OH NOOOOOOOOOOOOOO

Brom 2010/03/14(Sun)11:33 No. 12595 ID: f98e0b
File 126859160973.jpg - (15.38KB , 323x458 , sillycat.jpg )

>>322305
><Numbers>Believe it or not
><Numbers>People were overreacting about your post as well
><Brom>what
><Numbers>Some actually found it offensive
><Brom>who
><Brom>wait what

Just to clarify:
No one thought this post was actually angry and serious, right?
Because if you did you are a silly goose.

>>322374
Yes. I approve of this.

Plague!!NkAwOzZ2H0 2010/03/14(Sun)16:23 No. 12616 ID: 2ecd97
File 126860902271.jpg - (172.56KB , 1000x890 , 1228984938183.jpg )

>>322374
Pocket kitten agrees.