Why did the mod delete my quest thread about embodiments of concepts fighting a meaningless war against humans due to a conspiracy and leave up GOD DAMN STRIKE WITCHES AND MAHOU SHOUNEN

>>20519
Because the mod is a weeaboo faggot.

Cruxador 2012/03/15(Thu)20:24 No. 20719 ID: 72d49b
File 133186826678.png - (88.49KB , 898x554 , Untitled2.png )

I didn't make an elf slave wat do thread. All I did was say that elf slave wat do isn't explicitly against any rule. I can see the mod's point about rule 6 applying, but why the fuck is this a seven day ban?

I am left to conclude that the mod is a faggot.

Banning people for posting in "troll threads" kind of seems against the whole /tg/ "take a shitpost, make something worthwhile out of it" thing.

>>20731

That has never been a /tg/ thing. No moreso than on /v/. It happened once in a blue moon.

>>20731
I wasn't even in an elf slave wat do thread. It was just pointing out something that didn't fit well under any rule in off-topic discussion in a normal thread.

>>20732
I've seen it happen pretty damn often.

>>20731
Unfortunately, it is also a tacit encouragement of troll threads. The "just sort it out amongst yourselves" route of dealing with troll threads works fine among a generally level-headed population but, well, 4chan.

>>20733

You have hilariously low standards for 'worthwhile.'

I just got banned for a week for "Completely retarded shitposting and trolling." The catch? I have spent the last couple days posting in precisely one thread, and I'm fairly sure I did not troll in it even once.

I posted an appeal, but am not expecting it to do anything. I mean, why would it? Why would they care they maybe possibly banned one person by accident?

So apparently Quest threads on /tg/ are automatic autosage?
Anyone got any info on that?

>>20754
The autosage bug has been around for some time now. It's not just quest threads.

Bob 2012/04/29(Sun)17:55 No. 21050 ID: 7ec85f
File 133574732483.jpg - (221.07KB , 1609x640 , mattban.jpg )

I was aware the mod had...issues with our favourite games developer but this exceeded expectations.

>>21061
Wait, what?

>>21062
What don't you get? He was banned for posting in a Thulsa Doom thread. Kind of retarded to ban for just posting in it but I imagine the mod would just say it falls under rule 6.

>>21064
I don't get what Thulsa Doom has to do with porn.

I'm not sure I want to know.

>>21097
It's kinda a meme thing. "Bitches for Thulsa Doom and all. You post Thulsa Doom, and people think you want bitches.

>>21097
Thulsa Doom, traditionally on /tg/, demands bitches. He received tribute recently from that flutteranon camwhore, and others, although I've not seen her around lately and don't know what the story is there if indeed there is one. I've also seen Thulsa Doom herald some more generic porn, lately. Prior to Flutteranon I don't think there had been Thulsa Doom threads for a few years, though.

>>21105

If it makes you feel better I posted a female dog = /

Buncha shitty metathreads lately.

Oh, and to provide content: Sergal is no longer autoban word, and tgchan just got linked from one of said "gtfo quest" threads.

By, indeed, a sergal-avatar. 19654502

>>21629
So that's where all the shitty suggestions came from!

We haven't needed this thread in a long time. But lately 4chan cup threads have been getting deleted and now this thread was:
https://archive.foolz.us/tg/thread/23192301/
Admittedly, it's not directly on topic; it starts about shirtless adventuring and then some good arguments are made about the merits of Imperial notation (and the same ones we're all familiar with in favor of metric) and it was beginning to discuss theology when it was deleted. With minor but continuous forays into gay territory due to OP's image choice. So maybe it's not totally worth getting mad over, but still. There's moderation on /tg/ again.

But now this one's gone
https://archive.foolz.us/tg/thread/23194393/
That one strikes me as plenty /tg/-related.

On the other hand for that one it's also a possibility that the OP deleted it.

I wasn't aware that /tg/ ever stopped being a police state.

Wow it's really sickening how many people in this thread are defending the mod. I don't even know what to call you. Cancer doesn't seem a strong enough word.

>>23912
what about... DOUBLE CANCER???

Also you're an idiot.

>>23912
>defending
>cancer
That's a bad mindset. Communication only works if people are allowed to share ideas that seem ridiculous. Even if you think it's wrong, even if I think it's wrong, we have to let people say things and subject them to fair debate. Otherwise, we might end up prejudiced against an idea that turns out to be perfectly good.

Bob 2013/03/03(Sun)14:10 No. 23939 ID: a16426
File 136234863846.jpg - (37.75KB , 1593x186 , tgcancermod.jpg )

>>23917
Except they're defending a mod who destroyed /tg/ by deleting and banning all manner of creative threads and content creators. Pic fucking related. So no, they're fucking idiots and should be quiet.

I guess some of you might not have been around for /tg/ before the mod but I was and it was easily the best forum/board of any kind I have ever posted on. Then some dipshit ruined it because he wanted to feel like he had a big dick.

>>23939

/tg/ was already a shithole. Your memory is terrible.

>>23940
>/tg/ was already a shithole. Your memory is terrible.
The real crux of the matter. 99% of threads are shit now? 99% of threads were always shit. You don't remember shit threads, so 'the olden days' will always look rosy and perfect in hindsight.

>>23946
But is that /tg/ merely conforming to Sturgeon's Law, or is it exceptional in its shitholeness?

>>23946
I'm not contesting this. I'm just saying that the remaining 1% used to be better.

Hell, the 99% was less bad too.

>>23949
>Hell, the 99% was less bad too.
If we're talking about directly before the mod appeared, not really. That was a really bad summer.

>>23950
Agreed, but the year or so before that was the best /tg/ has ever seen.

>>23951

No, it sucked too. Still plenty of 40kfags trying to troll everything that wasn't 40k off the board.

>>23952
There was plenty of 40kids around, sure, including plenty of folks who brought 40k into threads about it, but people doing it with malicious intent (besides against furry threads as it would be against mlp today) was rare enough as to be all but nonexistant. It was just a case of people having fun with stuff.

>>23955

>was rare enough as to be all but nonexistant.

It is baffling to me that you would talk about 'a great year' for /tg/ when you were clearly never there.

And of course, before that it was all 'Shit Twinkie' edition wars.

SUCH A GREAT BOARD SURE DOES TURN TROLLING INTO GOLD ALL THE TIME

>>23996
No, that shit was never very common. And edition warring, while fairly retarded, was only ever more than a few threads at any given time for like, a month or so after 4e came out. After that there was rarely more than one active edition war at a time, and sometimes none at all.

okay, so you really didn't actually visit /tg/ during the time you are pining for.

Just wanted to confirm that.

>>23996
>>24012
I don't remember too much 40k spamming. I do remember a lot of people whining that 40k was so popular. I guess we know who was doing the whining huh? I guess you weren't able to appreciate the vast majority of the rest of the board that was actually good until the mod shit all over it and just prefer to focus on stupid horseshit that no one should care about, like people arguing about different editions of dungeons and dragons sometimes. Are you fucking kidding me?

"OH EVERYONE IS SUPER CREATIVE AND LAID BACK AND THERE IS A HILARIOUS THREAD WITH ORIGINAL CONTENT POSTED EVERY HOUR BUT OH WOE THERE ARE PEOPLE POSTING SPACE MARINES AND NOT LIKING D&D 4E! PLEASE SOMEONE SAVE US BY BANNING FUCKING EVERYONE AND EVERYTHING!"

>>24060
>THERE IS A HILARIOUS THREAD WITH ORIGINAL CONTENT POSTED EVERY HOUR
Now, let's not exaggerate. More like every week, although it wasn't particularly regular. Honestly, it's not much worse off now.

>>24060

See? This is the problem. Retards like you being against the mod make me more inclined to take his side even though it was the incorrect solution to /tg/'s problems. Changing one shithole for another shithole isn't improvement.

I haven't been on /tg/ in a long time, mainly because I am here usually. Or on some thread that is actually not a "police state" As you put it.

So, quests are now getting banned from /tg/. Not all and not most though, and some folks suspect vendetta. Quest thread generals are also getting banned, and notably this started after people in those threads started commenting on the deaths of the various quest threads.

>>26896
That's very ruff. Writequests are getting more and more welcome here, although whether the QMs themselves will mind our, um, ambiance is another question.

Yeah. There's a heavy focus on drawquests here still and the furries are stronk, but we always welcome new blood with open arms.
IIRC we already have a couple /tg/ refugees going here, right?

>>26899
We had that King's Blade guy, but he casualed out.

Personally, I go on /tg/ all the time and I'm glad quests and quest generals are being banned. I don't hate quests or I wouldn't be here, but they sure as fuck aren't related to traditional games and, worse yet, 90% of them are crap.

>>26900
90% on /tg/, that is. Only about 20% or so here, including the ones that are terrible on purpose.

>>26901
Well, the main issue on 4chan is there's nowhere more appropriate for quests to go.